"X is holding back Y" logic.
Specifically, you hear that a lot with gaming. Consoles hold back pc development, last gen holds back current gen..
The whole thing annoys me due to the logic.. As if there's a finite set of resources split between various niches of the market, with one niche coming at the expense of another.
If consoles/last gen/pick your scapegoat ceased to exist, would they divert those resources to better development of a single product?
Or would they trim the fat, have a round of layoffs, and squeeze for profit while keeping the current market standards?
I mean, if X isn't profitable, it dies.. If the 360/ps3/Xbone didn't have some benefit, they wouldn't be sinking time/resources into.them, am I right?